Rouse Announces Record Date For Rights Offering

Rouse Properties(RSE) had announced it intended to do a rights offering after its spinoff from General Growth Properties(GGP) was complete. This afternoon, Rouse announced that the offering will be set for the close of business on February 13.  Each Right will allow the holder to purchase 0.375094056 shares of stock at a price per share of $15, as previously announced. Brookfield Asset Management(BAM), the company’s largest shareholder, has agreed to purchase any unsubscribed shares, up to the $200 million total. As the company closed today at $13.80, it seems likely that Brookfield will purchase the majority of the shares.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in RSE

Checking In On Howard Hughes Corporation – Over A Year Later

With General Growth Properties (GGP) completing another spinoff,Rouse(RSElast week, it is worth checking in on how its first spinoff, the Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC), has fared. Here is a recent chart detailing HHC’s stock price since inception (apologies for the charting software – on vacation):

It has been quite a wild ride for the company – a relatively quick double followed by a steady descent after some earnings ‘disappointments’. Has anything really changed though? Whitney Tilson, head of T2 Partners, sure doesn’t think so. In fact, the company is still listed as a Top 10 position in the firm’s recently published annual letter (the company is discussed on page 15, but the letter is worth reading). T2 estimates intrinsic value of HHC at $77-$141, a sizable premium to the current share price. To read more about T2′s analysis of HHC, check out this July presentation put out by the fund.

I find that investing in real estate (and their associated stocks) can be a tricky game. While a solid understanding of the properties and their potential is crucial, the economic environment surrounding them is just as important. It is worth noting that the insiders, including Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Bill Ackman at Pershing Square, are still hanging on here. It even looks like some directors have been buying a little bit over the past few months. The bottom line is HHC is still full of the same high risk-high reward assets as it was at the time of its spinoff and given their nature, a year is a bit too short of a time frame for those assets to be judged. I would recommend patience here and view the decline as a chance to get back in at a more attractive price as opposed to having had to chase it up immediately post-spin.

Disclosure: Author currently holds no position in any stock mentioned.

Rouse Distribution Tax Information For GGP Shareholders

General Growth Properties(GGP) released informations to help shareholders who received Rouse(RSE) shares in

Logo of the Internal Revenue Service

the recent spinoff calculate their tax liabilities. The press release:

CHICAGO, Jan. 17, 2012  /PRNewswire/ — On January 12, 2012, General Growth Properties, Inc.  distributed (the “Distribution”) its shares in RPI to the shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 30, 2011 (each a “GGP Shareholder”). GGP Shareholders were entitled to receive approximately 0.0375 shares of RPI common stock for each GGP common share (representing a distribution ratio of 1:26.66) held as of December 30, 2011.

Tax Treatment of the Distribution.  GGP intends to report the Distribution of RPI common stock as a taxable dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Shareholders will be treated as receiving a taxable dividend upon the Distribution equal to the fair market value of the RPI common stock (and cash in lieu of fractional shares of such common stock) received in the Distribution and will take an adjusted basis, for federal income tax purposes, in such shares equal to the fair market value of such shares based on the market price on the date of the Distribution. The fair market value for federal income taxes of RPI common stock based on the volume weighted average price during January 12, 2012, was approximately $11.3612 per share (equivalent to $0.426 per GGP common share based on the distribution ratio of 1:26.66; Source: Bloomberg). The basis in shares held by GGP shareholders will not be altered as a result of the Distribution.

The tax law requires shareholders to retain records with respect to the Distribution, including information regarding the amount, basis and fair market value relating to the RPI common shares distributed. Shareholders may have additional reporting obligations to the Internal Revenue Service and/or other tax authorities.

CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR

This notice contains a general explanation of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Distribution for GGP Shareholders.  The information contained in this notice represents GGP’s general understanding of the application of certain existing U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations relating to the Distribution. It does not constitute tax advice and does not purport to be complete or describe the consequences that may apply to particular categories of GGP Shareholders (including, but not limited to, individuals who received GGP common shares upon the exercise of employee options or otherwise as compensation).  Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisor regarding the particular consequences of the Distribution, including the applicability and effect of all U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax laws.

GGP urges shareholders to read the Information Statement dated as of December 30, 2011, as filed by RPI as Exhibit 99.1 to its Current Report on Form 8-K on December 30, 2011, noting especially the discussion under the heading “Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences—Taxation of the Distribution.”

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:  TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH IRS CIRCULAR 230, SHAREHOLDERS ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT: (A) ANY DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL TAX ISSUES CONTAINED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON THEM UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE; (B) SUCH DISCUSSION IS WRITTEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION OR MARKETING BY GGP OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN; AND (C) SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD SEEK ADVICE BASED ON THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.

Given the high distribution ratio, it is likely that as is the case with Orchard Supply(OSH), many shareholders received tiny stakes, making it cumbersome for them to complete their taxes.  Shareholders should be sure to be careful and consult with a professional to properly handle this distribution.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in OSH

With Spinoff From General Growth Properties Complete, Rouse Is Ready To Awaken

General Growth Properties (GGP) is an unusual story, delivering profits to pre-bankruptcy shareholders and featuring several investing luminaries among its shareholders.  It has now completed its second spinoff in a little more than a year, as Rouse Properties (RSE) begins trading regular way tomorrow. Rouse completes trading on a when-issued basis at $11.30.

Rouse, which we previously wrote about here and here, owns 30 malls comprising 21 million square feet in 19 states. In its press release today, the company stated

Today, Rouse Properties, Inc. (Rouse) becomes an independent regional mall company that will formally commence “regular way” trading under the symbol RSE when the New York Stock Exchange opens January 13, 2012.

Rouse is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on the management, redevelopment, repositioning and acquisition of Class B regional malls. Initially, the Rouse portfolio consists of 30 geographically diverse enclosed malls, encompassing more than 21 million square feet in 19 states.

“The formation of a new REIT solely focused on Class B regional malls is a unique opportunity and Rouse is well positioned to not only achieve success, but continue building on its platform over time to further strengthen its market position,” said Andrew Silberfein, president and CEO of Rouse. “Rouse has the scale, capital and talent, as well as the flexibility and creativity to innovate and deliver the quality that Rouse is committed to achieving. This is an exciting day for Rouse and for our entire team of outstanding professionals.”

Executives with Rouse Properties, Inc. rang The Closing Bell® of the New York Stock Exchange today to commemorate the company’s entry on the NYSE.

General Growth Properties, Inc. completed the spin-off of Rouse through the distribution of shares of Rouse common stock to holders of GGP common stock. Under the terms of the spin-off, GGP stockholders received approximately 0.0375 shares of Rouse common stock for every share of GGP common stock owned as of the record date of December 30, 2011. Rouse is being advised on the spin-off by Wells Fargo Securities/Eastdil Secured, RBC Capital Markets, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co.

All information previously made public about Rouse can be found at rouseproperties.com.

According to Bloomberg:

     General Growth, based in Chicago, divested itself of the malls to concentrate on properties with higher rents and tenant sales and to reduce debt. Rouse’s malls are either the main shopping center in smaller U.S. cities or are second-tier properties in major markets.

“It’s not a troubled portfolio,” Craig Guttenplan, an analyst at CreditSights Inc. in London, said in a telephone interview before the spinoff was completed. “It’s just properties with less growth potential.”

Rouse’s 30 malls are 88 percent occupied and generate sales of about $280 per square foot, Nathan Isbee, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co., wrote in a Nov. 11 report. General Growth had tenant sales of $471 a square foot on a trailing 12-month basis as of Sept. 30, and a 92.7 percent occupancy rate for its regional malls, the company said on Nov. 9.

Rouse plans to spend $200 million on property redevelopment by the end of 2015 to boost net operating income, the company said in a regulatory filing last month.

Rouse was expected to have about $1.16 billion of debt with a weighted average interest rate of about 5.6 percent at the time of the spinoff, General Growth said on Dec. 20.

Andrew Silberfein took over as chief executive officer of Rouse on Jan. 2, according to a regulatory filing. Silberfein previously was executive vice president of retail and finance at Forest City Ratner Cos., where he worked since 1995.

Rouse has filed an S-11 to conduct a Rights Offering of 13,333,333 shares at $15, well above the current price. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), which through its shares of GGP will already own 37.2% of the company, is contractually obligated to purchase any shares not acquired by other shareholders. As a result, Rouse will receive the $200 million regardless of the interest in the offering. The company has not yet announced a date for the offering. The filing details how the $15 price was set:

The subscription price per share for the rights offering was determined by the disinterested members of GGP’s board of directors who are not affiliated with, and do not have a financial interest in, Brookfield. This price was determined in connection with the negotiation of the backstop agreement we entered into with Brookfield, which occured prior to the spin-off and, therefore, prior to the appointment of our post spin-off board of directors. In evaluating the subscription price, the disinterested members of GGP’s board of directors considered a number of factors, including, the estimated value of our mall portfolio, including an analysis of the same by an independent valuation firm, our anticipated net asset and gross enterprise value, which take into account our anticipated net working capital, our capital structure and the amount of debt we expect to have upon completion of the spin-off, and the price at which Brookfield was willing to backstop the rights offering. In considering the terms of the Brookfield backstop agreement, the disinterested directors of GGP’s board of directors also took into account advice of financial advisors and counsel in concluding that the subscription price is in our and GGP’s best interests. Based on these considerations, GGP’s board of directors determined that the $15.00 subscription price per share represented an appropriate subscription price.

The subscription price does not necessarily bear any relationship to the book value of our assets or our past operations, cash flows, losses, financial condition, net worth or any other established criteria used to value securities. You should not consider the subscription price to necessarily be an indication of the fair value of the common stock to be offered in this offering. After the date of this prospectus, our common stock may trade at prices above or below the subscription price.

Brookfield will receive $6 million for acting as a backstop, so its real cost will be between $13.80 and $14.55 per share, depending on how many shares it must buy. After the offering, the company will have approximately 49 million shares outstanding. We project the company to have had Funds From Operations (FFO) in 2011 of $45 million, and with the infusion of $200 million in capital and improved efficiency in 2012, we project $53 million in FFO. Assuming 49 million shares, this comes out to $.92 per share in 2011 and $1.08 in 2012. Applying a 15-17 multiple, which is well below GGP’s 24 multiple, , we see a fair value of $13.80-$18.36. Combined with Brookfield’s willingness to buy shares at $14.55 (as we presume they will be the only subscriber with the common stock trading well below $15), we believe the stock is undervalued at yesterday’s close of $11.30. Further, we expect the stock to drop in the short term as shareholders who have received small stakes (the distribution ratio was only 0.0375), or who are not interested in the company’s Class B assets, sell their shares in the coming days.  We believe this will create an exciting opportunity for investors to profit.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rouse Moves Down In First Day Of When Issued Trading

Rouse(RSE) began trading on a when issued basis today in anticipation of its spin off next month from General Growth Properties(GGP). The stock, which opened at 14, moved steadily downward and closed the day at 12 on 55,819 shares traded.  This represents a significant discount to book value and is below the $15/share, $200 million post-spin rights offering which Brookfield Asset Management has agreed to backstop.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned

Enhanced by Zemanta

General Growth Properties Rouses Rouse From Its Slumber

On the heels of last year’s spinoff of Howard Hughes Corp(HHC) which we wrote about here and here, General Growth Properties(GGP) approved plans today to spin off Rouse Properties on January 12, 2012 to shareholders as of December 30, 2011. The spinoff, which will be treated as a taxable dividend, is expected to trade as a REIT under the ticker RSE. First announced on August 1, the company revives the Rouse name(acquired in 2004) and creates a portfolio of 30 Class B malls in 19 states totaling over 21 million square feet.  The new company will have significant debt of $1.16B against just over $1.6B in equity.  A powerpoint presentation on the transaction with additional info and rationale can be found here. The company recently hired Andrew Silberfein as its first CEO. Silberfein had been executive vice president of retail & finance at Forest City Ratner Companies.

This is another transaction where existing shareholders will be left with tiny stakes as the distribution ratio is .0375 shares of Rouse for each share of GGP. This dynamic tends to lead to an initial drop in share price as investors dump their insignificant holdings.  There will, however, be a rights offering of $200 million at $15 per share subsequent to the distribution. Brookfield Asset Management, a key player in GGP’s emergence from bankruptcy with value for shareholders, has committed to exercising any rights not exercised by other shareholders.

Beginning with the bankruptcy process where pre-bankruptcy shareholders were made whole, through the spinoff of HHC and beyond, GGP and its management have consistently performed for shareholders.  Rouse may be another opportunity for shareholders to profit, particularly if economic conditions in the United States continue to improve.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned

Enhanced by Zemanta

Updates on General Growth and Howard Hughes

The GGP drama is finally nearing its end and time is running out to jump aboard the Howard Hughes Corporation prior to its spinoff from General Growth Properties (GGP). With GGP’s emergence from bankruptcy around the corner, the company announced November 1st as the date for distribution of shares of the two separate publicly traded corporations. According to the plan, shareholders will receive .0983 of a share of Howard Hughes for every share of the ‘old’ GGP they own. The company also filled out its management team, by naming Sandeep Mathrani, formerly President of the retail division at Vornado Trust,  as its new CEO.

On the spinoff side, Howard Hughes  has filed for an IPO. The company will offer 22.3 million shares for sale and warrants for the purchase of up to 8 million shares leaving the total shares outstanding at 37.7 million (not including the warrants).  Apparently, Blackstone Real Estate Partners VI LP and other investors have agreed to buy shares at $47.62 – perhaps establishing a share price benchmark. The company will trade under the ticker ‘HHC’.

Disclosure: Author currently owns no shares in any stock mentioned

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Mysterious Allure Of Howard Hughes

General Growth Properties
Image via Wikipedia

Amidst the turmoil of 2009, my alma mater hosted a small gathering for its alumni working on Wall Street. Typically, these events involve a fair amount of drinking, active networking, soliciting of donations and the inevitable token ‘brief’ remarks from someone in the industry. That evening’s guest of honor was none other than Bill Ackman, head of activist hedge fund Pershing Square, who was fresh off of a licking from Target’s (TGT) shareholders. Having met Mr. Ackman previously, I was rather excited to hear from him as he is always both entertaining and insightful. Instead of running through some prepared remarks, he opened the floor to questions and promised a reply to everything he could ‘legally answer’. The crowd was happy to oblige and we peppered him with questions ranging from his background, experiences with Target and his overall thoughts on the economy. Finally, someone fired off the question that was in the forefront of everyone’s mind – ‘so, what are you looking at now?’

There was a brief pause, but his answer of course was General Growth Properties (GGP), also known as the REIT which filed the largest real estate bankruptcy that April. As he laid out his investment thesis about why this was no ordinary bankruptcy, I quickly checked the ticker on my phone – the stock was trading at around a dollar. Fast forward a year and a half which included a raucous bidding war between Simon Property Group and Brookfield/Fairholme/Pershing and GGP is ready to emerge from bankruptcy while sitting at over $17 per share. Not bad.

Adding to the intrigue is the company’s plan to spin out some of its properties into another company when it emerges from bankruptcy (expected Nov 8th).  The spinoff will be called the Howard Hughes Corporation, named after the renowned recluse with ties to one of its properties. According to the 2009 Annual Report Letter from the CEO (worth reading) the plan is for the parent to own “largely stable, income-producing shopping mall properties and other assets” while the other company “will own a diverse portfolio of assets with less near-term cash flow but attractive longer-term growth prospects.” As a result of its different strategy, the new company will not be structured as a REIT.

With General Growth retaining ownership of roughly 180 malls (#2 in the country), which properties will end up in the Howard Hughes Corp portfolio? Included in their holdings is a 22,500 acre master-planned community in Las Vegas, New York City’s South Street Seaport shopping center and other mall developments in locales such as Charlotte, Houston and Virginia. The turnaround of these sites will be tied to the overall recovery of the real estate sector so investors will definitely require some patience and the stomach for some serious speculative activity.

The Brookfield/Fairholme/Pershing group has pledged $250 million to Howard Hughes Corp and at least in the beginning, Brookfield will be responsible for management of the properties. Also raising eyebrows was the announcement that Mr. Ackman was named chairman of the spinoff – clearly he (and his hedge funds) will be invested in its performance. I expect piggybacking investors to follow him (and Fairholme) along for the ride. The CEO position is expected to be filled after the company is spun off, although it is currently occupied by David Arthur, Brookfield’s managing partner of North American real estate investments.

The plan to emerge from bankruptcy was approved today by US bankruptcy judge Allan Gropper. The company restructured close to $15 billion in debt and secured $6.8 billion in capital from sources such as Brookfield, Pershing, Fairholme, Blackstone and the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. As a result, all creditors are expected to be repaid in full and even existing shareholders have benefited from the recovery.

Due to the bankruptcy and involvement of several high profile names, this spinoff is attracting a lot of attention. Perhaps it deserves it though and the situation smacks of some of the examples brought down by Joel Greenblatt in his book on the subject. With some hard work spent digging through the legal documents one might find attractive investments in both the parent (much stronger balance sheet) and in the assets they dump into the spinoff (probably more longer term investments). Today’s WSJ seems to think so and suggests that at current prices, one would be acquiring the assets of Howard Hughes for next to nothing (they used cap rate valuation method based on several estimates).

As is often the case with spinoffs, there is still time to conduct due diligence and we will keep you updated on the matter.

Disclaimer: Author currently holds no position in any stock mentioned

Enhanced by Zemanta